Civil Law Misconceptions Exposed

The dangerous misinformation about civil law, jurisdiction, and traffic law that gets people arrested

DANGEROUS MISINFORMATION ALERT

These "gurus" are giving advice that will get you arrested, fined, and worse. They mix civil law concepts into criminal matters, encourage vexatious behavior, and spread complete lies about traffic law and jurisdiction.

Based on 12+ years of study and real court testing since 2023 - I've seen these tactics fail spectacularly.

What the "Gurus" Tell You

  • "Mix civil law into criminal proceedings" - Use trust law in traffic court
  • "Be defiant and vexatious" - Argue with judges, refuse to participate
  • "Get a DOT number to avoid jurisdiction" - The ultimate contradiction
  • "Traffic laws don't apply to private travel" - Completely false
  • "Make the judge a trustee of your trust" - Backfires completely

What Actually Happens in Court

  • Civil law arguments are dismissed - Criminal courts follow criminal procedure
  • Vexatious behavior = contempt charges - Additional fines and jail time
  • DOT number = MORE jurisdiction - You just registered with the government
  • State police powers are constitutional - Traffic laws are valid
  • Trust arguments prove you're IN the trust - Logic backfires

The DOT Number Contradiction (LMAO!)

This is the most ridiculous advice ever given. Let me break down the stupidity.

The "Guru" Logic

Step 1: "You need to rebut jurisdiction - don't let the state control you!"

Step 2: "Get a DOT number to prove you're in commerce!"

Step 3: "Now you're outside their jurisdiction!"

The Reality Check

DOT = Department of Transportation - A FEDERAL AGENCY!

Getting a DOT number means:

  • You're registering WITH the government
  • You're accepting their authority to regulate you
  • You're placing yourself DIRECTLY under their jurisdiction
  • You now have MORE regulations to follow, not fewer
  • You've created a paper trail of government compliance

IF YOU'RE TRYING TO AVOID JURISDICTION, WHY ARE YOU REGISTERING WITH THE GOVERNMENT?! 🤣

Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Reality vs. Fantasy

They fundamentally misunderstand what subject matter jurisdiction means

Their Misunderstanding

"Courts Need Your Consent"

They believe you can "rebut jurisdiction" by not consenting or by using magic words.

"Traffic Laws Are Commercial"

They think driving regulations only apply to commercial vehicles.

"Private vs. Commercial Travel"

They believe "private" travel is somehow exempt from state laws.

Legal Reality

Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Definition: The court's authority to hear a particular type of case. Traffic courts have jurisdiction over traffic violations - period.

State Police Powers

Constitutional Authority: States have the power to regulate motor vehicle operation for public safety under the 10th Amendment.

No "Private" Exception

Legal Fact: Operating a motor vehicle on public roads is a regulated activity regardless of purpose.

Constitutional Authority for Traffic Laws

10th Amendment

"Powers not delegated to the United States... are reserved to the States"

States have the authority to regulate activities within their borders for public safety.

Police Powers

States have inherent police powers to protect public health, safety, and welfare.

Motor vehicle regulation clearly falls under public safety.

The Cestui Que Vie Trust Backfire

How their own logic destroys their argument - they prove they're IN the trust

Their Theory

Claim: "Your birth certificate created a trust, and you're not part of that trust."

Strategy: "Make the judge or prosecutor the trustee of your trust."

Expected Result: "They'll have to dismiss because of trust law conflicts."

The Logical Backfire

If You're Giving Directives About "Your" Trust...

  • You're claiming authority over the trust
  • You're making decisions about trust property
  • You're acting as if you have standing in the trust
  • BY TRUST LAW, THIS MAKES YOU A BENEFICIARY OR SETTLOR!

Trust Law Reality Check:

Only parties to a trust can give directives about that trust.

If you're NOT part of the trust (as you claim), then:

  • You have no standing to make any claims about it
  • You can't appoint trustees
  • You can't give instructions about trust property
  • The court would dismiss you for lack of standing

🚨 EXPOSED: YouTube University Constitutional Lies

The dangerous misinformation about administrative courts and the 14th Amendment

The "Administrative Court" Deception

❌ What YouTube University Teaches:

  • • Courts are "administrative" not "constitutional"
  • • You can opt out of court jurisdiction
  • • Void out all statutory codes and procedures
  • • Administrative = illegitimate authority

✅ Constitutional Reality:

  • • Courts operate under administrative PROCEDURES
  • • Administrative procedures IMPLEMENT constitutional law
  • • STATUTORY CODES govern the process you're IN
  • • Learn the rules, don't void them out!

🤔 The Logic Test:

If courts are "administrative" and that makes them illegitimate...
Why don't these gurus teach you to use ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL RULES?
Why do they tell you to void out the very STATUTORY CODES that govern the process?
Answer: Because they don't understand constitutional law!

14th Amendment: PROTECTION, Not Subjection

❌ The YouTube University LIE:

  • • 14th Amendment makes you a "corporate subject"
  • • "Citizen" = government property
  • • 14th Amendment enslaves you to federal government
  • • Reject citizenship to be "free"

✅ Historical TRUTH:

  • • Post-Dred Scott correction - citizenship for all born in US
  • • 14th Amendment is a HAND CANNON for Black Americans
  • • Puts you on par with "citizen" as Constitution defines
  • • PROTECTS citizens FROM government overreach

📜 The Constitutional Framework:

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857): Declared Black Americans could never be citizens

14th Amendment (1868): "All persons born or naturalized in the United States...are citizens"

The Power: Equal Protection Clause protects ALL citizens from state AND federal overreach

The Reality: It's protection FROM government, not subjection TO government!

🎯 The Real Education:

YouTube University teaches you to reject the very constitutional protections designed to shield you from government abuse.
The 14th Amendment doesn't make you government property - it makes the government accountable to YOU!
Don't throw away your constitutional shield because gurus don't understand history!

The "Pro Se" Terminology Deception

❌ What YouTube University Teaches:

  • • "Don't say 'pro se' - it gives them jurisdiction!"
  • • "Use 'in propria persona' instead"
  • • "Say 'sui juris' - it's more powerful"
  • • "Latin terms protect your sovereignty"
  • • "Modern legal terms are traps"

✅ February 24, 2025 Reality:

  • • Court acknowledged "pro se rights" with no issues
  • • Prosecution acknowledged "pro se rights"
  • • Judge Brennan conducted proper Grazier hearing
  • • No jurisdictional problems whatsoever
  • • Modern courts understand "pro se" perfectly

🤡 The Reality Check:

YouTube gurus tell you to avoid "pro se" and use archaic Latin terms from the 1800s.
Result: You sound like you're cosplaying as a colonial-era lawyer while everyone else speaks modern English.

DEFENDANT: "I appear in propria persona, sui juris, without the United States..."

JUDGE: "Are you representing yourself?"

DEFENDANT: "I am here sui juris, in my proper person..."

JUDGE: "Sir, are you pro se or do you have an attorney? Simple question."

📚 The Legal Education:

  • "Pro se" = Modern legal term meaning "for oneself" (self-representation)
  • Courts are familiar with pro se litigants and have procedures for them
  • Using archaic Latin makes you look confused, not sovereign
  • Clear communication serves your interests better than theatrical performance
  • February 24th proof: "Pro se" worked perfectly with proper procedure

Mock Scenario: If Courts Actually Entertained This Nonsense

DEFENDANT: "Your Honor, I'm appointing you as trustee of the JOHN DOE trust..."

JUDGE: "Counselor, if the defendant claims he's not part of this alleged trust, how does he have standing to make appointments regarding it?"

PROSECUTOR: "Exactly, Your Honor. Under trust law, only beneficiaries or settlors have standing to direct trust matters. By making these claims, defendant has just admitted he IS a party to the trust."

JUDGE: "The defendant has contradicted his own argument. Motion denied. Guilty as charged."

RESULT: Their own logic destroys their argument! 🎭

Consequences of Vexatious Behavior

What happens when you follow their advice to be "defiant" and "challenge the court"

Contempt of Court

  • • Additional fines ($500-$5,000)
  • • Jail time (days to months)
  • • Criminal record enhancement
  • • Loss of credibility for any future proceedings

Vexatious Litigant Status

  • • Banned from filing without permission
  • • All future filings must be pre-approved
  • • Permanent court record notation
  • • Severely limited legal options

Escalated Charges

  • • Simple traffic ticket → multiple charges
  • • Resisting arrest charges
  • • Obstruction of justice
  • • Failure to appear (if you walk out)

The "Gurus" Won't Tell You This

While you're sitting in jail for contempt, they're at home making more YouTube videos and selling more eBooks to the next victim.

THEY MAKE MONEY FROM YOUR FAILURE!

What Actually Works in Traffic Court

Real strategies that can actually help - based on legitimate law

Legitimate Defenses

  • Due Process Challenges: Improper notice, procedural errors
  • Equipment Calibration: Radar/speed detection accuracy
  • Officer Training: Proper certification and procedures
  • Constitutional Issues: 4th Amendment search/seizure violations

Court Etiquette

  • Respectful Behavior: "Yes, Your Honor" / "No, Your Honor"
  • Proper Dress: Business attire shows respect for the court
  • Prepared Arguments: Know the facts, know the law
  • Legal Terminology: Use proper legal language, not made-up terms

Stop Being a Victim of Bad Legal Advice

Learn the difference between pseudolegal nonsense and constitutional law that actually works in court.